Love for God and Love for Neighbor

I wrote this piece a few years ago, but I republish it now because I think these observations are important now more than ever. I’ve been thinking a lot lately about how we make Justification a completely vertical reality pertaining only to God, but don’t think often think of it as effecting our horizontal relationships with other people. But we are wrong in this. Being justified before God is part and parcel of being in just relationships with other persons. We cannot have God and ignore our neighbors. I think my journey to this realization began a few years ago with this post. 

Saul’s Conversion: The Rest of the Story

It struck me this morning that Saul’s conversion story in Acts 9 is just as much a story about his reconciliation with other people as it is a story about his reconciliation to God. After all, it is not God in some abstract sense that Saul curses in vs. 1. No, it is the Lord’s disciples whom he is “breathing out murderous threats against.” (1)

In other words, Saul’s sins are a violation of God’s law made tangible in his sin against the Lord’s disciples. It is precisely there, in that broken human to human relationship, that Saul’s sins against Christ exist and become incarnate, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?” (9:4)

Here the 2 Great Commandments – love of God and love of neighbor – are shown to be so intertwined that separation is nonsensical.

Saul is a sinner against God because he does not love his neighbor as himself.

Saul is a sinner against other human beings because he does not love God with his entire heart, soul, mind, and strength.

Interestingly, I’ve never heard this passage preached this way. I always hear it as a ‘gospel’ passage whereby God reconciles Paul to Himself and Himself alone.

But this is only half the story – God tells Saul to go into the city and await instruction. Saul later encounters a group of disciples who are afraid of him; he then spends several days with them (19), probably seeking their forgiveness, learning from them, and healing a very broken relationship with them. It is this part of the story I’ve never heard from an Evangelical pulpit.

But if contemporary Evangelicals wish to maintain some moral authority in the postmodern world, we must begin to pick up this other side of this story. No longer can we permit ourselves to believe the gospel is just a spiritual reconciliation of “my” individual self and God. No, no, we must see that the gospel inescapably entails reconciliation between “me” and the larger community of human beings created in God’s image…especially those whom I have hurt or excluded. The true gospel necessarily holds together love for God and love for neighbor. Any gospel that doesn’t proclaim both isn’t THE gospel.

The Whores All Seemed to Love Him, and the Drunks Proposed a Toast

I have a friend who, though he is a pastor, is always surrounded by people who are on the outside or the fringes of the church.

You might think because of this that he’s particularly adept at doing ministry to non-Christians.

But as you get to know him more, you see that that’s not actually true. He has no particular gift for evangelism, so far as I know. Rather, he’s just really good at relationships of authenticity.

And, though I haven’t asked him this, I suspect that he finds some of his most fulfilling authentic relationships with people outside the church – people who don’t treat him like ‘pastor,’ people who don’t treat him as anything more than just a normal guy loving God and loving people, people who love him for who he is, not what he does for a living.

I bet both he and they find this relationship of mutual authenticity refreshing. After all, this relationship of authenticity also tells them that they don’t have to try to be anything other than what they are. That they don’t have to be Christians if they’re not really Christians. They don’t have to watch their language around him. They don’t have to fake anything.

When I read about Jesus eating with tax collectors and sinners in Luke 15, I see a similar thing. I don’t think Jesus was probably particularly adept at what we call evangelism. I think Jesus was just really good at relationships – and in particular, he was really good at including people who were excluded by the dominant religious atmosphere.

Eating with a person in the ancient world was a sociological symbol. It said, “I approve of you and your behavior.” This is why the religious people wouldn’t sit with sinners – they didn’t want to seem like they approved of sinful behavior.

But Jesus doesn’t care about what good, proper, religious society thinks. He sits with sinners precisely because he loves them. They’re real with him. They don’t expect him to be anything more than he is. And he makes them feel like they can truly be themselves – honest, open, authentic…even about those less than honorable parts of their lives (and is not authentic openness the beginnings of confession and repentance?!?!). And so, unsurprisingly, it almost seems like the sinners liked Jesus a lot more than the religious folks did.

I take it as a compliment when someone tells me that if they didn’t know me, they wouldn’t know I was a pastor. It tells me that maybe I’m doing something right. Maybe I’m inching closer to what Jesus looked like: to quote Rich Mullins, “The whores all seemed to love him, and the drunks proposed a toast – and they say, Surely God is with us!”

So you tell me: Have you ever met a pastor who was more at home with those outside the church than inside? Do you ever find yourself in situations where people expect you to be something other than you are? And who do you think Jesus would make it a point to eat with in our world?

Forgetting Rachael and Her Children

The Christian story refuses to deny the sheer and terrible power of evil. Evil is weaved right into the fabric of our story, showing how God’s perfect world has gone awry, destroying itself under the repulsive influence of sin-infected human persons.

In Matthew 2 we read about one of the most heinous acts of evil in human history – the slaughtering of little children at the hands of a tyrannical ruler bent on keeping his power.

And while Matthew certainly does have a larger political agenda in mind (exalting Jesus as king over Herod), I’m intrigued that he concludes the story with this citation from Jeremiah,

“A voice is heard in Ramah,
    weeping and great mourning,
Rachel weeping for her children
    and refusing to be comforted,
    because they are no more.”

What I saw yesterday and what I’m still seeing today is Christians and non-Christians alike attempting to use this tragedy for political gain or for a leg-up in the culture wars. And while there is certainly a time and place for discussions of gun control and God in schools, that time is not now.

This is the time for weeping and great mourning.

This is the time for moms to hold their children close and thank God they still have them.

This is the time to refuse to be comforted by cheap answers, finger pointing, and surface level victories in the culture wars that merely distract us from our pain and the pain of these victims….these victims who are no more.

These children are already being forgotten because we’ve moved on to fighting each other. And that, friends, is a terrible injustice.

Jeremiah and Matthew at least take the time to write a lamenting poem about the suffering of their children. They take time to reflect and pray.

But we…well…we go right to finger pointing. We go right to the blame game. We go right to our culture wars. And that’s a problem on the right and the left.

And in all this fighting, we forget Rachael. And we forget her children. And in forgetting those who suffer we also forget the God who mourns with those who suffer.

God With Us 12/13/12

God with Us: Rediscovering the Meaning of Christmas
Introduction: Eugene Peterson

 
Every year Christmas comes around again and forces us to deal with God in the context of demanding and inconvenient children; gatherings of family members, many of whom we spend the rest of the year avoiding; all the crasser forms of greed and commercialized materiality; garish lights and decorations. Or maybe the other way around: Christmas forces us to deal with the mess of our humanity in the context of God who has already entered that mess in the glorious birth of Jesus.
Eugene Peterson, God with Us. 9.
 

Musings on the Message #2: Preaching as Trinitarian Sacrament

If Christian preaching is not Trinitarian then it is neither “Christian” nor “preaching.” Christian preaching is from first to last a sacramental revelation of the Triune God revealed as Father, Son, and Spirit. This God existed from all eternity as a community of persons, each distinct, each connected to the other in a loving union. This Trinity of persons provides not only the content of Christian preaching, but also the model for Christian preaching – a model which emphasizes unity, diversity, the necessity of incarnation (an embodied living out of the message preached – ethos), a dwelling within the story of redemption, and overflowing love which humbly and selflessly reaches out to creation and elicits praise to the Father. Without these essential aspects, we do not have Christian preaching. We cannot.

The Triune God heralded in our message has not only created but has also redeemed. A fully Trinitarian theology of preaching cannot separate creation and redemption. For the God who created (Gen. 1), through the Son (Col. 1:15-29) with the assistance of the Spirit (Gen. 1:2) is the same God who redeems and restores the creation through the Son’s death and resurrection, and indwells the believing church in the person of the Holy Spirit. Because creation and redemption of the entire cosmos, not merely individual humans, are the main themes of the biblical narrative pointing to the Triune God, if Christian preaching forgets or ignores these aspects then it will continue to limp along without a sense of purpose outside of entertainment and retrenchment (Clapp, Peculiar People).  Instead of participating with the Triune God in the restoration of all things, preaching will continually misunderstand its role in the modern world, assuming it exists for merely to meet felt needs, but offer little in the way of confrontation with the holy and self-giving Three-in-One God who has made himself and his kingdom a concrete reality in this world. 

Last, it cannot be overstressed that preaching is not only about the Trinity, preaching is a sacramental embodiment of Triune God because it is empowered, enlivened, centered and given its form by the Trinity. By contrast, de-centered preaching is not centered in the active word of God for our unique, concrete contemporary communities. De-centered preaching assumes that the Triune God spoke in the past, but does not do so in our day. Trinitarian preaching, however, understands that the Father works in the present. In the past he enacted the story of redemption by commissioning the Son and the Spirit to work among the church for the world. Through the current work of the Son and the current indwelling of the Spirit, the Father is at work in the world through the preaching, proclaiming church. Only when preaching is contextualized within the larger narrative of Trinitarian doctrine will preaching have anything valuable to communicate to contemporary audience.

A Radical Review: The Bad, Pt. 4 (False Dichotomy 5 – God’s Love for Us vs. God’s Love for His Glory)

God’s Love for Us vs. God’s Love for His Glory: 
Platt really shows his Reformed cards throughout the book when he discusses his understanding of God’s motivations for saving the world. After citing Ezekiel 36, Platt goes on to say, “What a statement! God goes so far as to say that when he acts among his people, he doesn’t show his grace, mercy, and justice for their sake but for the sake of his holy name among the nations.” (68). 

There is much to be said about this, but one of the conclusions one must come to when Platt’s words are traced throughout his book is that the God he worships is a God who is self-centered and self-serving – He’s a God who seeks his own glory above everything else and is self-referenced in all of His actions. Indeed, Platt even says this, “God centers on himself.” (71) 

The problem is, when I look at Jesus on the cross, I see there a God who took on shame, not glory. I see a God who acted in love for sinners. I see a God who gave up his own glory for death.

Platt would criticize my understanding of Jesus’ death, to be sure. Beginning on page 70, pay attention here(!), Platt argues that, “‘God loves me’ is not the essence of biblical Christianity. Because if ‘God loves me’ is the message of Christianity, then who is the object of Christianity?….me.” 

Now, here’s the thing: First of all, I understand that we have a very self-referenced understanding of Christianity. And this self-referenced understanding needs to be criticized and we need to repent of our “me” focused religion. But this is much different than what Platt is arguing. 
For when I say, “God loves me,” who cares if I’m the objectBecause God is the subject! It doesn’t take glory away from God for him to love me. It doesn’t take away his centrality to the gospel story for him to love me! Rather, it magnifies it! I didn’t love him first, he loved me first! I didn’t make the move toward knowing him, he made the move toward saving me! Yes, I am the object of God’s affection! But God is the subject of the sentence and the subject of creation and redemption! Let’s stop laying this either/or game. God is both glorious and great. And God loves me enough to give up that glory for me and you and all of creation. That’s what love means – it is self-giving and finds glory in the ‘other’!  

In the end, Platt wants to argue that God is the object of God’s affection and love, not me. 

This is a really complicated discussion that I will take up in the final section of my review. But in the end, it’s just another one of his false dichotomies. God loving me and God seeking to make his name great among the nations are not antithetical. In fact, quite the opposite, it is through his great love for me/us that he makes his name great among the nations…so that he might love them too, and they might love him! His love for us does not put the focus on us. His love for us puts the focus on his self-giving (not self-serving!) nature! There’s no theological reason for Platt to separate God’s love and His glory. Neither his love nor his glory end with us; they are always to be offered to the world for the sake of His great name and love being given to all people. (Please see my final section, “What was missing” for further reflections on this subject. 

A Radical Review: The Really Good, Pt. 2

Takes the Hard Words of Jesus Seriously:

On a number of occasions, Platt points out that too frequently we take the hard words of Jesus and explain them away, rub off their sharp edges, and make them palatable to modern ears (i.e. the story of Jesus telling the Rich Young Ruler to give away all his possessions). Platt does a good job of criticizing such interpretive moves that make it easier, rather than harder, to be a disciple of Jesus. I find that Calvinsits, often more than Arminians, are willing to embrace these hard words. I can’t really explain why. But in this matter, I wish we were more like the Calvinists.

 

Holiness is Defined by What We Do, Not By What We Avoid Doing:

Typical of most young pastors and Christians, Platt is fed up with the Christian life being primarily defined in terms of legalistic rules about what we shouldn’t do. When we define the Christian life this way, we reduce holiness and Christian living to avoidance of sin (or what looks like sin) instead of the active pursuit of God. Contrary to this legalistic view of spiritual growth and holiness, Platt rightly maintains that genuine discipleship involves propelling Christians into the world, not the avoidance of the world (105). A Christianity which tries to keep itself pure by avoiding the world or pretending bad things don’t exist is a Christianity that will quickly find itself irrelevant, isolated, and obsolete. Holiness should be defined by what we do in the world and for the world, not by how good a job we do avoiding the world.

 

Platt Spoke Favorably of John Wesley:

This may not seem like that big of a deal to most people, but Platt is overtly (if you know what you’re looking for) a 5-Point Calvinist. Calvinists are not always fond of speaking well of Arminians, and John Wesley is very much Prince Arminian. Platt says nothing about Wesley’s theology, but on page 128 he tells a wonderful and challenging story of Wesley’s deep and profound passion for making sure that everyone had their basic needs met. Wesley was making, in today’s terms, about $120,000 a year, but he was living as if he was only making about $20,000 so that he could give the rest away to the poor. This was actually a consistent theme through Wesley’s life. He died with mere pocket change in his possession because he had given it all away.  I’m deeply appreciative of Platt bringing that information to the fore in his book. It made me proud of my Methodist heritage!

 

The Incarnation is Why I’m a Christian

Someone* asked tonight why I’m a Christian. Here was my response….

The incarnation. It’s amazing and beautiful and tragic and joyful and the ultimate expression of love. It is the whole of human history summed up in a person. It is the ideal humanity lived by one of us. It is the lover seeking out his bride. It is the full manifestation of Triune self-giving love. It is what it means to be fully alive…fully human…fully real. It is death and resurrection, humility and exaltation, shame and glory. 

Without it, Christianity doesn’t make sense. My draw to it is NOT just that I see it because of the (historical) evidence. Rather, it is through the lens of the incarnation that all other things make sense…especially love.

The person who asked this is a Christian, so I wasn’t afraid to use Christianeese in my answer. They know the conceptual language of Christianity. That always makes it easier :)

Disturbed

Here’s my sermon from our series through the book of Acts: Disturbed from Acts 16.

http://www.mylhumc.net/502652.ihtml

The sermon should be near the top of the player’s list, but if not, click on the tab that says, “speakers,” click on my name (Tom Fuerst) and it’s the sermon titled, “Disturbed.”

Acts 16: Disturbed

Introduction: In college I was a biblical studies major. One of the degree requirements was that I had to take a year of New Testament Greek. My soon-to-be-wife was an English major and she didn’t have that requirement. But our plans after graduation were to be Bible Translators inPapua New Guinea. So my senior year, my grammarian of a wife, joined all the other biblical studies majors and took Greek.

One of two women in the course, they destroyed every man in that room. We’d get quizzes back and Cassie’s grades were 100% here, 99% there. And mine were…well, let’s just say I passed.

Now, in order to be prepared to do Bible translation, our plans were for BOTH OF US, after college to go to the best seminary our denomination offered – a seminary known for its firm theological beliefs and conservative theology. So we went to visit the school. But when the welcome crew came out, they began speaking just with me. And I said, “Well, my wife is planning on getting a degree, too. Not just me.” They got a huge smile on their faces, and finally look at her, they said, “So, you’re planning on doing our unaccredited pastor’s-wife degree. And we were like, “Uh, what’s that?” “Well, it helps you learn how to plan meals when your husband’s bringing a group from the church home without any notice?”

Now, listen, there’s nothing wrong with being a stay-at-home-mom…that’s what my wife does now. But that wasn’t our plan at the time, and I said, “No. My wife is a brilliant grammarian. We want to do missions. She wants a legitimate, academic degree.” For the rest of the day, as we’d meet new people, they’d come up and just talk to me. And then I’d say, “My wife’s getting a degree, too.” And almost every time people said, “Oh, is she getting the non-accredited pastor’s wife degree?” NO!!

Needless to say, we decided against going to that school. It seems, looking back, that the Holy Spirit was in much of what happened that day – that the Spirit was calling our hearts away from our plans and goals because God had something else in mind. The Spirit disturbed our plans and agendas and we ended up going in a direction we never expected or intended.

EXPOSITION: In a similar way, Paul’s got a plan laid out to take the gospel to Asia, but the Holy Spirit inhibits his progress and gives him a different plan. The Spirit breaks in and disturbs Paul’s planning, strategizing, and agenda-making and calls him to do things he never intended or expected to do. Had Paul drawn up this evangelism strategy himself, he would went to Asia, not Greece. But the Spirit had different plans. And the disturbing of Paul’s goals and plans leads to the gospel disturbing and shaking the very foundation of the first city they come to – Philippi.

Application: Many of us have experienced this kind of thing – we thought we were following God’s will to do one thing and the next thing we know, he’s got us going in a direction we never saw coming – or didn’t even want. And often we get frustrated by the supposed setbacks in life instead of taking an opportunity to see where God is at work in a different way than we expected. Often we even push forward in a direction we know God doesn’t want because we’ve put all our eggs in that basket or even made an idol out of what was otherwise a good plan.

But if we will but sit back and listen, we will see that the beauty of God breaking in and disturbing us is that this is God’s way of freeing us from the tyranny of our own supposed omniscience, the tyranny of assumptions of being all-knowing, the tyranny of our own agendas and strategies. And by liberating us, the Spirit frees us to go with the flow of wherever God is leading. And it reveals that the power of the gospel in our lives is never a matter of our strategy or type-A drivenness, but the power of the gospel is in the freedom of the Holy Spirit to change all our plans and give us new goals…God’s goals.

EXPLANATION: So here they is Paul and Silas, having been denied access to Asia, they go toPhilippi. Within the city ofPhilippi, they meet 3 different people and through preaching to them, they disturb the entire city with the gospel.

Lydia: The first thing Paul likes to do when he goes into a new town is find the local Jewish worship gathering, called a synagogue. Now synagogues had certain rules, and one of those rules was, in order for it to be a proper, functioning synagogue, there had to be at least 10 Jewish men present. The rabbis did not trust women not to get carried away with religious fanaticism, so they had this rule that if there were 1 million women, but only 9 men, then you did not have an official synagogue. You had to have no less than 10 men.

So, on the Sabbath, Paul goes into Philippito find a synagogue. And what he finds is a gathering of local women praying – specifically a fairly rich woman named Lydia, who appears to be leader of one of these unofficial synagogues. And Paul sits down and begins to share the gospel with these women as if they’re a legitimate synagogue.

EXPOSITION: Now, you’ve got to understand the radical nature of what is going on here. Not only has Paul approached these women as if they’re an officially recognized synagogue –and thus showing them that while their own religion and husbands don’t give them credit, Paul does – but even more radical than that, in the ancient world, you don’t try to convert a woman to your religion without the permission of her husband or her father. But Paul is obliterating these rules. Paul sees women as rightfully able to make their own spiritual decisions without the direction and permission of a man. And he shows these women by his actions that the gospel elevates their status and gives them an equal position with men before God. The religious leaders and the surrounding culture thought these women were an inferior species, but Paul saw them as equally created in God’s image.

Application: You see, the gospel disturbs every aspect of human culture and religion – including the ways in which men and women relate to each other. We are not called to be each other’s superiors, rulers, or dictators; we are called to die for one another, serve one another, and mutually love one another. We are not called to force submission on one another through wielding Bible verses like swords; we are called to honor the gifts and talents God’s Spirit has given to each of us. Paul radically and unexpectedly validates these women’s worship, even when other men denied them. And God used his actions to open their hearts. But the gospel’s disturbance of Philippian culture and religion is just beginning.

Young Woman: Because when Paul leaves Lydia’s synagogue, he encounters a different young woman. She is not rich like Lydia. She is not a synagogue leader. In fact, she’s a slave who possesses, or rather, is possessed by a unique gift. Her owners basically sell her out to the highest bidder because she has the ability to tell the future using Parseltongue. For those of you who don’t speak Harry Potter, the spirit possessing her, giving her the ability to tell the future, is the spirit of a Python.

Greek mythology provides the background for this Python Spirit: The high god Zeus was married to the goddess Hera. But Zeus wasn’t exactly known for his marital fidelity. At some point, Zeus impregnated a lesser, but very beautiful, goddess named Leto. When Hera his wife found out, she sent out this giant Python to kill Leto for apparently seducing her husband. With this python chasing her, Leto could not settle anywhere long enough to give birth. She searched and searched for a safe place all over the world until, finally, she found a secluded island and for 9 days labored to give birth to twins – The first was Artemis, goddess of the hunt, who after being born, helped her mom give birth to the second child, Apollo, the god of archery. The Greek god Apollo, when he was a whole 4 days old decided to take revenge on this snake that had caused his mother such distress during her pregnancy. So he hunted it down and found it’s cave underneath a mountain at Delphi – a cave believed to be the center of the world. When he confronted the snake, it lunged at him, but Apollo, avoiding its strike, shot an arrow through the snakes head and killed it. After the snake’s death, a temple was constructed on the site of the rotting flesh, a temple that would give priests and priestesses an inside track to the god Apollo. I’m a little unclear as to how the process would work, but apparently the combination of the rotting flesh of the snake, the cave at the center of the world, and the great god Apollo would empower the priests and priestesses to make predictions about the future.

Now, as Paul and his companions are going through Philippithey are disrupted by a young girl with the ability to tell people’s future according to this python spirit. And she’s following Paul and his friends around, shouting, “Hey everyone, pay attention to these men! They are servants of the God above all gods; they can tell you how to be saved!”

And I don’t know if she’s mocking them or if Paul just doesn’t think the gospel needs the publicity of the Greek gods, but Paul turns around and commands the Spirit, in the name of Jesus, to come out of this girl. And it immediately obeys and submits to Jesus’ name. In other words, notice the subtlety here – It is Jesus, not Zeus, who is the God above all Gods; it is Jesus, not Apollos, who has power over the spirit of the python; it is Jesus, not this cave, who is the center of the universe! In everyway imaginable, Paul’s actions demonstrate the superiority of Jesus to the Greek gods and the Greek myths. Paul is deconstructing and disrupting and disturbing their religion and their very national identity. When Jesus’ name is proclaimed to a people, that name disturbs all that people hold dear; Jesus’ name renders their gods and their myths powerless and meaningless before his cross.

And the same thing goes for our own national myths and gods. Let me take something we’re all familiar with: There’s this story we tell our children about when George Washington’s dad told him not to cut down the cherry tree. He did. When asked about it, George said, “I cannot tell a lie, I cut down that cherry tree.” Now, the story is designed to reinforce for children the value of telling the truth. But I wonder how many people were like me when they heard this as a child, and walked away believing that George Washington never told a lie? The story, then, reinforced in my mind the infallibility of George Washington, and in fact, the infallibility of all or our founding fathers. But here’s the thing, 1) not only is the story of the cherry tree not even historically factual, more importantly 2) it is always good for Christians to keep in mind that our founding father’s were not inspired men like the biblical writers, they were not infallible, they were sinful human beings just like you and me. Yes, they had a great idea, and yes, they dreamed big, worth-while dreams. But they were broken and sinful like the rest of us. It was Jesus who could not tell a lie. It was Jesus who honored no falsehood. George Washington is not the icon of honesty for children – Jesus Christ is. George Washington is not our moral standard – Jesus Christ is.

The gospel calls us to take a serious look at all our cultural myths and assumptions. Because just like Paul shows here in Philippi, the very nature of the gospel, itself, is that it radically critiques our lives, our culture, and our nation and shows along the way that only Jesus Christ is the center of the world, only Jesus Christ is the faithful lover of truth, only Jesus Christ is knower of our future, only Jesus Christ should be our American Dream. And it teaches us that neither our founding fathers, nor the next president can hold a candle to the saving power of Jesus Christ. For only Jesus will outlive Democracy, Communism, Socialism, or any other form of government humans could ever invent. That is the message of Paul’s gospel. And it is a disturbing one, both to Greeks and to us.

Now, Paul casts out this spirit, but it’s far from over. This girl was a cash-cow for her owners – she was making them lots of money with her prophetic utterances. So Paul just cost these people some huge cash flow and they’re not going to take it lying down. So they rally the troops and begin making accusations against Paul and Silas. They have them beaten and arrested.

Philippian Jailor: Now, you’d think, upon being arrested, that these guys would be saying, “Seriously, Lord, we were going to go toAsia and preach to thousands, but you disturbed our agenda and led us here. And now we’re sitting in this stink hole of a prison. No one has even invented Rabies shots yet, so we’re just waiting to get bit by some rat, frothing at the mouth. C’mon, Lord, we thought you knew better than this!”

But they don’t say that. Just as nobody expected them to preach to a women’s synagogue, just as no one expected them to so easily defeat the spirit of the python, so too, no one expected to hear these guys singing praise and worship choruses while in prison! They fully believe that God sent them toPhilippiand that God knows what he’s doing…even when things don’t look good.

You see, the gospel even disturbs our normal way of suffering. The gospel calls us to ask the question, “How can God be glorified in my pain? How can God’s gospel be made known to someone else through my suffering? How can my mourning be a testimony to the faithfulness of God” And believe me when I tell you, I completely understand that those are hard questions to ask…especially in the midst of your pain. But even in our mourning and sadness, we must see that the gospel is at it’s most powerful when it is speaking into and through the life of a hurting person. God does not cause our suffering in order to bring about some glorious purpose. But God is always looking to bring glorious purposes out of our suffering.

And so we look at our own lives and we see places where we feel imprisoned – imprisoned in depression, shackled in pain – both physical and emotional, unemployment, bad relationships, debt, or whatever – and the gospel calls us in the midst of it, like Paul and Silas, to sing…to sing praises…to let our hearts overflow with song, even when we don’t feel joyful. Because joy is more than just a feeling, joy is the ability to say, “This doesn’t look good, this doesn’t feel good, I don’t like this, this hurts,” but then in the same breath say, “God I will praise you in this prison, God I will praise you in this pain, God I will praise you whether my well is dry or overflowing.” That is joy. It is more than a feeling. It goes beyond our temporary circumstances. And it cannot help but sing, even when it hurts. It cannot help but sing, even in your prison. In fact, I might say, that singing produces joy – it affects your heart in the midst of your circumstances. That’s why you sing even when you don’t feel like it…because singing will bring you to a place where you DO FEEL LIKE IT.

And what do we have to lose by singing? Is self-pity getting us anywhere? Is secluding ourselves from our family and friends getting us anywhere? Is anger at God getting us anywhere? Is snapping at our kids getting us anywhere? I’m guaranteeing you that those things are not only not helping you, but they’re hurting you because they’re pushing people away from you. So try singing…even when it hurts the worst. Let joy well up within your heart, even when you don’t feel like it. Because God is most present in the heart that hurts but still chooses to sing, Though Satan should buffet, though trials should come, Let this blest assurance control, That Christ has regarded my helpless estate, And hath shed His own blood for my soul.

So here they are singing and out of nowhere they hear a deep grumble in the distance. At first, Paul thinks Silas ate something funky and his stomach is throwing a fit. But then the earth begins to shake so strongly that it breaks open the stocks of all the prisoners and flings the gates of the prison wide open. Now, any security guard in our world would’ve surely freaked out at this point, pulling out his weapon in an attempt to keep the prisoners from escaping, right?

Not the case in ancientRome. This security guard is held personally liable for any and all of these prisoners, so when this earthquake occurs, he knows that the escaping prisoners are on his head. And the only thing considered “honorable” at this point is for him to kill himself. So he pulls out his sword – he’s ready to take his life, leave his family, leave this world in the name of honor. But Paul disrupts him.

“Hey, hey, hey, don’t do that, man. We’re all here. None of us have escaped. No need to take such drastic measures.” Somehow Paul’s influence on the rest of the prisoners was such that when they could have been set free, they hung around. In the presence of such an influential man, in the aftershocks of such profound joy, the Jailor cannot help but ask, “What must I do to be saved?! Your God has disturbed my body, now I want him to save my soul! ”

And Paul simply says, “Believe in the Lord Jesus. Trust him to save you. Trust him who disturbed your nice, easy life to save you from yourself…trust him to turn your world upside down…trust the God who disturbs society, and turns family dynamics on their head, disturbs nations and challenges their myths of greatness and perfection, disturbs our suffering by calling us to sing in the midst of affliction, and disturbs the very earth itself, if that’s what needed to bring one more person into his kingdom. Trust him.

And the man believes Paul and his whole family is saved. All because God disturbed Paul’s plans to go to Asia.

The Holy Spirit disturbed the plans my wife and I had to go to the seminary we originally planned to attend. But if he had not done that, we would’ve never went to Asbury Theological Seminary; and if we had never went to Asbury Seminary we would’ve never ended up in Lynn Haven….disturbing you! When God disturbs your life, don’t see it as a setback, see it as an opportunity…an opportunity to disturb your world with the gospel of Jesus Christ.

 

Delighting in the Gift, Not the Packing Paper

Dora the Explorer is my daughter’s favorite show. Cassie and I love it because it’s educational (man, has it helped her vocabulary expand!), and because it’s not schizoid and random like Sponge Bob Square Pants.

Today Cassie and I were on our weekly lunch date and while walking through the mall we saw a “Backpack,” Dora’s trusty companion backpack that has his own special song and carries all the items Dora needs during her adventures. The price of Backpack is normal nearly $30, but its sale price was down to $4. So we got it…fully expecting the Phoebus to get really, really stoked.

About 5 minutes ago we gave it to her. She looked at it. Got a smile on her face. Pulled the packing paper out. Then threw Backpack on the ground, taking absolute joy in the packing paper!

Immediately, with a smile on my face (because, after all, I could smile – I only spent $4, not $30), I realized that this is exactly what I do with God.

In the cross of Jesus, God gave the world the greatest gift it could ever receive – Himself! And for free, no less!

But in so many ways we are prone to look at God’s gift, throw it down on the ground, and get distracted by the “filling”: Blessings are good, but they are not the God who gives them. Feelings are good, but they are hardly ever consistent. Theology is good, but theological pronouncements can never fully represent or take the place of the God to whom they point. Material possessions are good, but they can distract from God. Love is good, but when pursued for itself, it leaves us lacking.

These things are mere “filling” when compared with the real gift. We are permitted to delight in them, but often we throw down the gift and trade it for something that, well, ends up being nothing more than a bowl of soup compared to the family inheritance, the packing paper when compared to the Backpack.

The real gift is the God who blesses us even when we don’t see it; the real gift is the God who is present even when we lament his absence; the real gift is the God who cannot be shackled by our systematic theology but seeks always to draw us deeper and deeper into Himself (a place no systematic theology can fully comprehend); the real gift is the God who can call us to give all our possessions away in order to have eternal life; the real gift is the God who is Love in the flesh, in it’s purest form – self-giving love that serves others and seeks them above Itself.

So let’s delight in the gift, not just the packing paper. After all, when the gift IS the Giver, delighting in the gift IS delighting in the Giver.

 

 

What are some other ways we trade the Gift for the packing paper? Is there a time where God showed you this was exactly what you were doing? How did He redirect your focus?